Sustained release reactant blends

ABSTRACT

There is provided according to the present invention a sustained release reactant blend and methods for making and using the sustained release reactant blends. There is further provided methods for using such blends in the in situ or ex situ remediation of contaminated groundwater and in the treatment of water and wastewater. There is further provided, according to the present invention, methods for controllably coating reactant blends whereby such coated blends exhibit sustained release properties and have an open structure.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Divisional of U.S. Non-Provisional patentapplication Ser. No. 14/776,811, filed Sep. 15, 2018, which claimspriority from International Application No. PCT/US2014/029247, filed onMar. 14, 2014, which claims priority from U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 61/793,464, filed Mar. 15, 2013.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods for making sustained releasereactant blends and the use of such blends in the in situ or ex situremediation of contaminated groundwater and soil, and in the treatmentof water and wastewater. The present invention further relates tomethods for controllably coating reactant blends whereby such coatedblends exhibit sustained release properties.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The in situ cleanup of soil and groundwater to remove contaminants hasinvited many attempts. The intention behind site cleanup is inherentlygreen; however, remedial activities use energy, water, and materialresources to achieve cleanup objectives. Traditional remediationtechnologies (e.g., pump and treat, air sparging, soil vapor extraction,or multiphase extraction) require electricity and fossil fuel to powerequipment to remove contamination from soil and ground water. Extractedfluids are then processed aboveground, or disposed of in landfills whenfilters are used. The intractable nature of subsurface contaminationsuggests the need to explore the use of innovative technologies thatreduce the environmental footprint of remedial treatments. Reactivematerials in permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) have proven very usefulfor transforming or destroying organic waste in situ. Once emplaced theytypically do not require a continued supply of electrical power and havethe added benefit of creating a reactive zone for the destruction ofcontaminants in place.

Controlled-release techniques have been utilized extensively in diversefields such as pharmaceutical and agrochemical technologies. However,controlled and sustained release of an oxidant during in situ chemicaloxidation (ISCO) is an emerging concept that is extremely relevant tothe field of environmental remediation, yet to-date has received littleattention. ISCO using the oxidants permanganate, persulfate, andcatalyzed hydrogen peroxide has shown great promise for remediation ofmany recalcitrant organic contaminants of concern (COC). Because theoxidant also reacts with natural organic matter, inorganic soilconstituents, and other reduced compounds, the presence of a protectivebarrier that controls oxidant release may enhance the efficiency of ISCOand allow for long-term, low-cost treatment of chlorinated solvents. Tothis end, sustained release potassium permanganate and slow-releaseactivated sodium persulfate were developed. Slow-release permanganateand activated persulfate have been demonstrated to be effective forsustained-removal of organic contaminants in both laboratory and fieldefforts (e.g., Dugan, et al., 2013; Christensen, et al., 2012; Khambu,et al., 2012). Paraffin wax was used as the environmentally benign andbiodegradable matrix material for solid potassium permanganate (KMnO₄)or sodium persulfate (NaS₂O₈) particles. The paraffin wax matrixprotects the solid permanganate or persulfate particles from instantdissolution and facilitates slow-release of the oxidant over longperiods of time. The sustained release oxidant materials contain between65%-85% permanganate or persulfate and can be formed as cylinders fordirect push applications in reactive barriers, or chipped material forhydro-fracturing into low permeability media.

The prior art has demonstrated that the permanganate concentrations willinitially be high when flow is introduced to the system, however aftershort periods of time the oxidant concentrations decrease to unfavorablelevels. As presented in FIG. 2, for example, permanganate concentrationsmay drop to a few hundred parts per million (or less) within a fewmonths which results in incomplete degradation of organic contaminantsdue to decreased concentrations of the oxidant over time.

Coated oxidants have been proposed for use in in situ remediation ofgroundwater and ex situ treatment of water and wastewater. Wax coatedpotassium permanganate pellets, for example, have been suggested forinjection into contaminated groundwater. It is suggested that thecontaminants in the groundwater will dissolve the wax and that the thusexposed potassium permanganate will then oxidize the contaminants. U.S.Pat. No. 7,431,849. The potassium permanganate, or other oxidant, orcombination of oxidants, in the pellets, is completely coated prior tocontacting the contaminants in the groundwater. As provided in the priorart: “[W]hen the coated reactant is contacted with or exposed to thecontaminants it dissolves, reacts, or absorbs at least one of thetargeted compound(s) found in the media and exposes at least onereactant to the targeted compounds where it may react.” Id.

It has been hypothesized that wax coated permanganate when used tooxidize contaminated groundwater did so either by diffusion of thecontaminant through the wax coating surrounding the potassiumpermanganate or by dissolution of the wax coating by the contaminant,thus exposing the potassium permanganate. “The Characteristics ofPotassium Permanganate Coated in Polymer,” Ross, C. M., Thesis (M.S.),Clemson University (2001). The study sought to make completely coatedpermanganate.

Wax coated potassium permanganate cylinders have also been suggested forinsertion into contaminated groundwater. “Using Slow-releasePermanganate Candles to Remove TCE From a Low Permeable Aquifer at aFormer Landfill,” Christenson, Mark D., et al., University ofNebraska-Lincoln, Oct. 1, 2012. The cylinders, also referred to as“candles,” are made by adding heated potassium permanganate to meltedparaffin wax and then mixing the melted wax and potassium permanganateuntil all of the potassium permanganate is blended with the wax.

Combinations of solid oxidants coated in a dissolvable matrix, such as awax matrix, have been proposed for use in in situ remediation ofcontaminated groundwater. U.S. Pat. No. 7,431,849. In this instance, afirst oxidant is first coated with wax, then with a second oxidant, andthe combination is then coated with wax. The resulting particle ismultilayered with layers of oxidant separated by wax. Id.

Combinations of liquid oxidants have been used for in situ treatment ofgroundwater. It has been reported that a solution of potassiumpermanganate and a solution of sodium persulfate may be addedsimultaneously or serially to oxidize contaminants in situ ingroundwater. U.S. Pat. No. 6,474,908. According to the prior art, thesoil oxidant demand is satisfied by the sodium persulfate and volatileorganic compounds are oxidized by the potassium permanganate. Id.

It appears that the prior art relies on either completely coatedoxidants or liquid oxidants, whether a single oxidant or multipleoxidants are used for treatment of contaminated water and wastewater.The coated reactants of the prior art tend to release the coatedoxidants at an unsteady rate which, in some instances, may be dependenton the time it takes for the groundwater contaminant to dissolve theencapsulant and expose the oxidant. If the dissolution of theencapsulant occurs slowly, then the oxidant concentration released fromthe coated reactant will be initially low with a sudden increase oncedissolution of the encapsulant is well under way. If the encapsulantdissolves quickly, then the oxidant will be substantially releasedinitially and then the concentration of oxidant will quickly diminishover time. When applied to the in situ treatment of contaminatedgroundwater, such prior art coated reactants may not be effective insubstantially reducing the contaminant concentration because of theunsteady release of oxidants.

Accordingly, what is needed is a coated oxidant that provides for asteady or essentially uniform release of oxidants into contaminatedwater or wastewater. What is also needed is a coated oxidant thatincludes a combination of oxidants, such as potassium permanganate andsodium persulfate, and provides for a steady or essentially uniformrelease of oxidants into contaminated water or wastewater.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a combined sustained release reactantcomprising: a first reactant; a second reactant; and a matrix; whereinthe first reactant and the second reactant are incompletely coated bythe matrix such that the combination of matrix, first reactant andsecond reactant forms an open structured mass.

The present invention further provides a combined sustained releaseoxidant comprising: potassium permanganate; sodium persulfate; andparaffin wax; wherein the paraffin wax provides a coating for thepotassium permanganate and the sodium persulfate such that the sustainedrelease oxidant is an open structured mass.

The present invention further provides a process for making a combinedsustained release reactant, the process comprising: selecting a firstreactant; selecting a second reactant; preparing a matrix, the preparedmatrix capable of coating the first reactant and the second reactant;combining the first reactant, the second reactant and the preparedmatrix by mixing to make a combination; allowing the combination to formthe combined sustained release reactant; wherein the combined sustainedrelease reactant is characterized by the amount of potassiumpermanganate released during a standard assay of permanganate usingsodium oxalate.

FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a chart illustrating the release of sodium persulfate in theabsence of potassium permanganate from cylinders made according to themethods of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a chart illustrating the release of potassium permanganate inthe absence of sodium persulfate from cylinders made according to themethods of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a chart illustrating the release of potassium permanganate inthe presence of sodium persulfate from cylinders made according to themethods of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a chart illustrating the release of sodium persulfate in thepresence of potassium permanganate from cylinders made according to themethods of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a photograph of a MULTIOX cylinder before and after testing.

FIG. 6 is a photograph of a prior art coated oxidant taken aftertesting.

FIG. 7 is a chart illustrating the relative effectiveness of sustainedrelease oxidant blends at 0.002M concentration on the removal ofbenzene-toluene.

FIG. 8 is a chart illustrating the relative effectiveness of sustainedrelease oxidant blends at 0.002M concentration on the removal ofbenzene-toluene.

FIG. 9 is a schematic illustrating the construction of a compositecylinder of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a chart illustrating the effect of increasing the surfacearea on reactant sustained release.

FIG. 11 is a chart illustrating oxidant release and trichlorethyleneremoval as a function of increased surface area.

FIG. 12 is a chart illustrating is a chart illustrating the release ofpotassium permanganate and sodium persulfate from a cylinder madeaccording to the methods of the present invention, the cylinderincluding a 50:50 blend of potassium permanganate and sodium persulfate.

FIG. 13 is a chart illustrating is a chart illustrating the release ofpotassium permanganate and sodium persulfate from a cylinder madeaccording to the methods of the present invention, the cylinderincluding a 75:25 blend of potassium permanganate and sodium persulfate,respectively.

FIG. 14 is a chart illustrating the longevity of oxidant release from asustained release cylinder.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

According to embodiments of the present invention, a blendedconfiguration of potassium permanganate with persulfate in a paraffinwax matrix has demonstrated an unexpected and enhanced release ofpermanganate in laboratory experiments that is not realized whenpotassium permanganate is used alone in the wax matrix medium. As usedherein, the release characteristics of the reactant blends of thepresent invention are described in terms of the amount of time areactant continues to release from the matrix material when the reactantblend is exposed to a liquid, such as ground water. Regardless of thetypes of reactants or matrix materials used, such releasecharacteristics are also referred to as “sustained reactant release.”Embodiments of the present invention may be formed as cylinders,pellets, bee-bees, pastilles, pucks, grids, engineered forms, as-castshapes and other shapes. Embodiments of the present invention are blendsof potassium permanganate and sodium persulfate in a hydrocarbon matrixwherein the hydrocarbon matrix has an open structure which allows aportion of the reactants to be exposed. Unlike prior art coated oxidantswhich are completely coated, the coated oxidants of the presentinvention reside in an open structure hydrocarbon matrix, which makesthe coated oxidant blends of the present invention more efficacious thanthe prior art. Further embodiments of the present invention includecombined reactants contained in an open structure hydrocarbon matrix.Such coated combined reactants are particularly suited for use intreating contaminated water or wastewater.

Embodiments of the present invention are made by blending a quantity ofpotassium permanganate and sodium persulfate with a melted paraffin waxunder agitation so as to form a structure which has exposed reactantparticles when the mixture of oxidants and wax is cooled. By having anopen structure, embodiments of the present invention make reactantsimmediately available for dissolution and diffusion when the structureis exposed to water. Coated oxidants of the present invention exhibitsurprising sustained release of the oxidants in in situ remediationapplications compared to fully encapsulated reactants and coatedoxidants containing only potassium permanganate. Surprisingly, thecombination of potassium permanganate and sodium persulfate in an openstructure hydrocarbon matrix provides for a sustained release of theoxidants when the coated oxidant is exposed to water in either in situor ex situ remediation, or in the treatment of drinking or wastewater.

Example 1

To manufacture 1000 grams of a sustained release coated oxidant of thepresent invention with 80% combined oxidant mass loading, 200 grams of aparaffin wax is melted in a jacketed mixing vessel at 140° F. To themelted paraffin wax, 400 grams of potassium permanganate and 400 gramsof sodium persulfate are added and the wax is allowed to agitate atapproximately 200 revolutions per minute for 20 to 30 minutes. After ahomogeneous slurry is achieved the material is dispensed into acardboard tube, capped, and allowed to cool until solidified. In apreferred embodiment, the total mass loading of oxidant ranges from 73%to 85% (weight per weight) which allows for higher oxidant release ratesto be achieved as well as almost complete utilization of the oxidantwhen exposed to flowing water over time. The thus prepared cylinder hasan open structure such that oxidant particles are not completely coatedwith wax. In making coated reactants of the present invention, themixing of the slurry is controlled such that a sample of the coatedreactants will release a reasonably predictable amount of potassiumpermanganate and sodium persulfate. Accordingly, manufacture ofsustained release reactants can be controlled such that the openstructure of the matrix is consistent from cylinder to cylinder. Themethods of this Example 1 are applicable to other single reactants andother combinations of reactants, all of which are within the spirit andscope of the present invention.

Optionally, partially coated reactants of the present invention may bemade using a single reactant, such as potassium permanganate, sodiumpersulfate, metal salts, sulfates, carbonates, ligands, phosphates,reductants, buffering reagents, carbon sources (e.g., carbohydrates,cyclodextrins) calcium nitrate, calcium peroxide, and lime, asunlimiting examples, such that the coated reactants are in a matrix,such as hydrocarbon, resin, polymeric, carboxymethyl cellulose, ethylmethylcellulose, gum arabic GG, gellan gum GK, gum karaya, gumtragacanth, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose,hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, locust bean gum, methylcellulose,mesquite gum, polyvinylpyrrolidone, soluble soybean polysaccharide,cellulose, gum arabic, gum karaya, mesquite gum, galactomannans, solublesoybean, polysaccharide, fatty acids/alcohols, glycerides, waxes(carnauba, candelillia, beeswax, paraffin, cottonseed, canola),phospholipids, marine carrageenan, alginates, microbial/animal xanthan,gellan, dextran, chitosan, caseins, whey proteins, gelatin, hydrolyzedpolyacrylamide, fatty acids/alcohols (e.g., steric, linoleic),glycerides, phospholipids, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polypropylene,polystyrene, polyvinylacetate, cyclodextrins, mineral oil, silicone oil,silicone wax, 580 WAX, ST WAX-30, AMS-C30, cosmetic wax, polylacticacid, methylcellulose, ethylcellulose, starch hydrolysates,polyphosphates, metal oxides (e.g., iron, manganese, silicon, aluminum)or other insoluble and biodegradable matrix, which has an open structurethat allows a portion of the reactant to be exposed. As a generalmatter, the matrix materials of the present invention are insoluble, butbiodegradable. Combinations of the aforementioned reactants, and othercombinations, may also be used in a single coated mass made according tothe principles of the present invention.

The porosity of the coated oxidant blends prepared according to theprinciples of the present invention is not alone responsible for thesustained release of the oxidants noted when the coated oxidant blendsare tested. This will be illustrated by a comparison of FIGS. 1 through4. Cylinders were made according to the method illustrated in Example 1to contain either a combination of potassium permanganate and sodiumpersulfate, referred to as MULTIOX cylinders, or to contain onlypotassium permanganate or only sodium persulfate. For the studies whichproduced the data shown in FIGS. 1 through 4, cylinders of the diameterslisted were prepared according to the method of Example 1. Thus, a labelwhich provides “2.5 MULTIOX” or “2.5 inch KMnO₄” or just “2.5 inch”refers to a 2.5 inch diameter cylinder. FIGS. 1 through 4 indicate theconcentrations of permanganate alone or persulfate alone in a MULTIOXcylinder piece loaded with a 50:50 ratio of oxidant on a weight perweight basis. It should be noted that the cylinder was used in the testthat generated the results shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. Only the oxidantmeasured was changed. To aid in interpreting the data of FIGS. 1 through4, the following table identifies the cylinders tested, the oxidantsused and the loadings of each oxidant for the figures.

TABLE 1 Sample Identification FIG. KMnO₄ Na₂S₂O₈ Water Num- OxidantsCylinder Loading Loading Flow rate ber Tested Diameters (w/w) (w/w)(mL/minute) 1 Na₂S₂O₈ 2.5 inch N/A 72% and 75% 0.6 2 KMnO₄ 1.35 and 80%N/A 0.75 2.5 inch 3 MULTIOX 1.35 and 40% 40% 0.6 2.5 inch 4 MULTIOX 1.35and 40% 40% 0.6 2.5 inch

The cylinders were cast in 18 inch lengths and then cut into 1 inchsections for use in testing. For the tests, a 1 inch section of each ofthe three types of cylinders were placed in individual columns throughwhich deionized water flowed at the rates listed in Table 1.Periodically, the deionized water exiting each column was sampled andmeasured for potassium permanganate concentration and/or sodiumpersulfate concentration, depending on the type of cylinder in therespective column. Standard test methods were used to determine theconcentration of potassium permanganate and sodium persulfate. Theresults of these tests are further described below.

FIG. 1 illustrates the release of sodium persulfate as a function oftime from a sustained release test cylinder which contained only sodiumpersulfate. As shown, the sodium persulfate concentration is initiallylow, then peaks after more than 30 days, and then subsides.Additionally, FIG. 1 shows that the persulfate concentrations initiallyincrease with time and reach higher oxidant concentrations as comparedto permanganate. FIG. 2 illustrates the release of potassiumpermanganate as a function of time from sustained release test cylinderswhich contained only potassium permanganate. As can be seen from anexamination of FIG. 2, there is a sudden initial release of potassiumpermanganate and then the concentration decreases over time for bothcylinders of differing diameters. The release characteristicsillustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 are not optimal for treating contaminatedwater or wastewater, or for in situ or ex situ remediation because ofthe dramatic changes in concentrations of the oxidants. As shown inFIGS. 3 and 4, embodiments of the present invention surprisingly exhibita sustained release of permanganate and sodium persulfate over time. Forexample, FIG. 3 shows permanganate release from a blend of sustainedrelease oxidants (50:50 blend of permanganate and persulfate). As can beseen from an examination of FIG. 3, permanganate concentrations arehigher in the MULTIOX cylinder as compared to the permanganate alonecylinders for both 1.35 and 2.5 inch diameter cylinder pieces. FIG. 4also shows permanganate and persulfate concentrations in MULTIOXsustained release cylinders.

Embodiments of the present invention were tested for release of oxidantunder flowing water. A cylinder of partially coated oxidants wasprepared as described in Example 1. The control for the test was asame-sized cylinder containing potassium permanganate that wascompletely coated by paraffin wax. The tests were conducted at roomtemperature. After exposure to flowing water for six months, thedepletion of oxidants from the cylinder prepared according to Example 1is readily apparent upon visual inspection of the cylinder, as shown inFIG. 5. Also shown in FIG. 5 is a photograph of the cylinder prior tothe test for purposes of comparison. The cylinder of potassiumpermanganate totally encapsulated with a thick coating of paraffin waxshowed essentially no loss of potassium permanganate during the sixmonth run of the test, as illustrated in FIG. 6. In a separate test, apellet of completely encapsulated potassium permanganate was immersed inwater for several days with no signs of potassium permanganate beingreleased from the pellet.

In addition to the enhanced permanganate release rates there could beunexpected reactivity that arises due to the presence of both oxidantsthat could be potentially beneficial for contaminants that arerelatively non-reactive to permanganate (e.g., benzene, carbontetrachloride). As illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8, the MULTIOX cylindersof the present invention show enhanced 24 hour mass removal ofbenzene-toluene mixtures from deionized water. The MULTIOX cylinderswere prepared as described in Example 1. As shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, aMULTIOX cylinder increased the total percent removal of benzene-tolueneat 0.002 molar concentration and 0.02 molar concentration, respectively,compared to cylinders containing either permanganate or persulfate atthe same concentrations.

Combined use of reactive amendments (or “reactants”) for water treatmenthas been increasing because of more stringent drinking waterregulations. Examples of this practice include combining chlorinedioxide and chlorine in pretreatment; chlorine dioxide and chlorine inpretreatment with chloramines in the distribution system and chlorinedioxide pretreatment and ozonation to lower bromate concentrations. Inaddition to reducing contaminants, combined use of reactants for odorcontrol could provide a synergistic benefit for water treatment bycombining a sulfide-reducing reagent with an oxidant for sulfide.

In addition to applying the combined reactants using the sustainedrelease practice to in situ and ex situ remediation applications, theprocess of combining reactants that are capable of controlling hydrogensulfide for wastewater applications in a slow-release paraffin waxmatrix is also of interest. H₂S is a toxic and potentially lethal gasfound in both industrial installations and in wastewater systems. Mostodor-control solutions for wastewater treatment systems treat the sourceof odors on a temporary basis but do not prevent the bad odor fromcoming back, and as a result require repeated dosing. The wastewaterpre-conditioning is based on establishing an anoxic biology within thewastewater treatment system. In the presence of nitrate(s), sulfatemetabolism is inhibited, thus preventing formation of hydrogen sulfide.In addition to odor issues, the presence of sulfuric acid within thewastewater collection system results in detrimental corrosion ofconcrete pipes. Accordingly, spraying embodiments of the presentinvention onto the walls of pipes may be useful in inhibiting corrosion.

-   -   1) In some embodiments the compound(s) would be capable of        removing a portion of one or more undesirable components in a        wastewater stream. For example, calcium nitrate may be effective        in reducing hydrogen sulfide by inhibiting the reduction of        sulfates by sulfate-reducing bacteria, thus mitigating hydrogen        sulfide formation.    -   2) In a second embodiment, applying a source of oxygen (for        example, calcium peroxide) to a wastewater stream to encourage        an alternative metabolic pathway so that bacteria present would        reduce the compound rather than sulfate could be beneficial.        This could be accomplished by introducing a sustained release        form of oxygen into the wastewater stream.    -   3) In a third embodiment for industrial wastewater applications        where heavy metal removal is desired, reactive amendments in a        sustained release form that initiate pH control and subsequent        precipitation and immobilization of metals would be beneficial.        This could include addition of soluble reactants such as lime or        polyphosphates to form insoluble metal hydroxides or metal        phosphates.    -   4) A variety of biocides are used in the oil and gas industry to        control the growth of bacteria and prevent the formation of        harmful byproducts of their growth (such as hydrogen sulfide).        In a fourth embodiment, sustained release forms of a soluble        reactive amendment (i.e., inorganic oxidizers) would be useful        to inhibit microbial growth.

Enhanced synergistic reaction kinetics with use of the MULTIOX cylindersof the present invention and the resultant degradation of a variety ofcontaminants is of concern as illustrated in Table 2. The enhancedremoval is a consequence of: 1) increased oxidant concentrations atmultiple time steps, 2) extended release of persulfate over longerperiods of time, and 3) the presence of multiple oxidants, allows foroxidative treatment of co-mingled mixtures of a variety of contaminants.For example, permanganate alone is less effective in oxidizing thecontaminant benzene but very effective in oxidizing toluene. This isimportant because many gas stations have petroleum hydrocarboncontamination present in the form of BTEX (i.e., benzene, toluene,ethylbenzene, and xylene). The presence of persulfate in MULTIOX allowsfor treatment of all BTEX compounds and other favorable synergies withother compounds are likely.

TABLE 2 Coupling Oxidation Kinetics with Observed KMNnO₄/Na₂S₂O₈ Release10-days KMnO₄ Release Na₂S₂O₈ Release t_(1/2) t_(1/2) t_(1/2) t_(1/2)t_(1/2) Concentration at Concentration at 1,4-dioxane Benzene TolueneEthylBenzene Xylene 10-days (mg/L) 10-days (mg/L) (days) (days) (days)(days) (days) 2.5″ MnO₄ Cylinder 1000 — 25.1 181.1 2.2 0.17 0.81 2.5″S₂O₈ Cylinder — 500 86.8 49.4 32.3 31.9 64.3 2.5″ MultiOx Cylinder 17502250 8 1.1 0.5 0.1 0.4 30-days KMnO₄ Release Na₂S₂O₈ Release t_(1/2)t_(1/2) t_(1/2) t_(1/2) t_(1/2) Concentration at Concentration at1,4-dioxane Benzene Toluene EthylBenzene Xylene 30-days (mg/L) 30-days(mg/L) (days) (days) (days) (days) (days) 2.5″ MnO₄ Cylinder 750 — 33.5241.4 2.9 0.2 1.1 2.5″ S₂O₈ Cylinder — 4500 9.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.8 2.5″MultiOx Cylinder 1250 1500 11.67 2.2 0.9 0.1 0.6 50-days KMnO₄ ReleaseNa₂S₂O₈ Release t_(1/2) t_(1/2) t_(1/2) t_(1/2) t_(1/2) Concentration atConcentration at 1,4-dioxane Benzene Toluene EthylBenzene Xylene50-days(mg/L) 50-days (mg/L) (days) (days) (days) (days) (days) 2.5″MnO₄ Cylinder 600 — 41.9 301.8 3.7 0.3 1.4 2.5″ S₂O₈ Cylinder — 125034.7 7.9 5.1 5.1 10.2 2.5″ MultiOx Cylinder 750 1000 18.3 5.4 1.7 0.2 1

Embodiments of the open structure coated reactants of the presentinvention may be used in composite cylinders as illustrated in FIG. 9.Such slow-release composite cylinders 10 comprise, for example, coatedpotassium permanganate 20 and are designed to release an essentiallyconstant flux of potassium permanganate at late-stage release. Thecomposite cylinder 10 comprises two regions: an inner cylindrical coreof solid potassium permanganate 30 surrounded by an annular region of acoated potassium permanganate 20 made to have an open structureconsistent with the principles of the present invention. The innercylindrical core 30 is separated from the coated potassium permanganate20 by a screen 40. The screen 40 may be made from stainless steel, PVC,cardboard or other materials. As the annular ring of coated potassiumpermanganate 20 dissolves towards the inner core 30, the rate ofpotassium permanganate release will decrease. Once the dissolutionreaches the inner core of solid potassium permanganate 30, the releaserate will be constant until all mass has been released from the innercore 30.

Referring now to FIGS. 10 and 11, the data provides evidence oflong-term sustained oxidant release that is enhanced by increasedsurface area. The cylinder used in the test to produce the data of FIG.10 contained 80% KMnO₄. The cylinder in FIG. 10 was subjected todeionized water at a flowrate of 0.5 mL/minute. The cylinder was 2.5inches in diameter and one inch long. As demonstrated, the release ofKMnO₄ was sustained for more than one year. The data shown in FIG. 10demonstrates that by increasing the surface area of the open structuredmatrix of the present invention, by increasing the diameter of thecylinder at a constant concentration of KMnO₄ in the cylinder, therelease of KMnO₄ surprisingly temporally extended. Persons of ordinaryskill in the art would expect that an increase in surface area of thematrix would increase the release rate of a reactant because of theincresed exposure to contaminant containing fluids. However, as shownherein, surprisingly and increase in surface area of the reactant blendsof the present invention extends or prolongs the release of thereactants over time. FIG. 11 demonstrates that a cylinder of the presentinvention (2.5 inch diameter by one inch long) effectively removes 0.7ppm of trichlorethylene (“TCE”) over a 165 day period. In the experimentwhich produced the data for FIG. 11 the cylinder was exposed to watercontaining 0.7 ppm flowing at a rate of 0.6 mL/minute at roomtemperature.

Referring now to FIG. 12, a 2.5 inch diameter by one inch long cylinderof the present invention was subjected to a flowrate of deionized waterof 0.6 mL/minute. The cylinder contained 40% KMnO4, 40% Na2S2O8, and 20%paraffin. As shown, the cylinder of the present invention showed asustained release of reactants for 148 days.

Table 3 below illustrates that cylinders of the present inventionrelease on-half or less of the reactants contained therein after 50days. The cylinders tested were 2.5 inch by one inch diameter cylindersin a paraffin matrix. The cylinders were then subjected to flowingdeionized water applied at 0.5 mL/minute. Surprisingly, reactant blendsof the present invention demonstrate sustained release well in excess ofone month.

TABLE 3 Release Characteristics of Reactant Blends of the PresentInvention Elapsed Time % Permanganate Blend composition (%) (days)released Permanganate (80%)-Matrix (20%) 50 27% Permanganate(40%)-Persulfate 50 43% (40%)-Matrix (20%) Permanganate (60%)-Persulfate50 50% (40%)-Matrix (20%)

Referring now to FIG. 13, a 2.5 inch diameter by one inch long cylinderof the present invention was subjected to a flowrate of deionized waterof 0.5 mL/minute. The cylinder contained 60% KMnO4, 20% Na2S2O8, and 20%paraffin. As shown, the cylinder of the present invention showed asustained release of reactants for 171 days.

As further shown in FIG. 13, the reactant release data from a singleoxidant cylinder was applied to a model to predict the longevity ofrelease for a reactive material. The simulation results predict asustained release of oxidant in excess of 2 years. It is expected thatcombined reactants of the present invention will maintain release ofreactants in excess of one year, given the release data in FIG. 14.

There has been provided, in accordance with the present invention andthe embodiments thereof, a combined reactant in an insoluble or solublematrix for removal of contaminants of concern for in situ or ex situremediation of soil and groundwater, as well as drinking water andwastewater applications. There has been further provided in accordancewith the present invention a coated combined oxidant comprisingpotassium permanganate and sodium persulfate in a paraffin matrix, theparaffin matrix having an open structure and the coated combined oxidantexhibiting enhanced oxidation as compared to either oxidant alone. Therehas also been provided a method for making a coated combined reactantsuch that the coating has an open structure and does not completelyencapsulate the reactants.

While the invention has been described with specific embodiments, manyalternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to thoseskilled in the art, in light of the foregoing description. Accordingly,it is intended to include all such alternatives, modifications andvariations within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

We claim:
 1. A process for treatment of contamination using a sustainedrelease reactant blend, the process comprising the steps of: forming asustained release reactant blend into a porous engineered shape, thesustained release reactant blend comprising a first reactant, a secondreactant, and a matrix; selecting a medium comprised of water, soil, ora combination of water and soil for treatment, the medium beingcontaminated with a contaminant having a half-life; treating the mediumwith the sustained release reactant blend; and reducing the half-life inthe presence of the sustained release reactant blend; wherein the porousengineered shape is defined by an open structure such that the mediumand contaminant can flow into the open structure and contact the firstand second reactants.
 2. The process of claim 1, wherein the matrix isparaffin wax.
 3. The process of claim 1, wherein the matrix is insolubleand biodegradable.
 4. The process of claim 1, wherein the first reactantand the second reactant provide for a sustained reactant release over atime period that is at least five months.
 5. The process of claim 1,wherein the sustained reactant release increases when a surface area ofthe sustained release reactant blend is increased.
 6. The process ofclaim 1, wherein the medium is contaminated with two or morecontaminants having a half-life, the half-life of each contaminant beingreduced in the presence of the sustained release reactant blend.
 7. Theprocess of claim 1, wherein the contaminant is organic.
 8. The processof claim 1, wherein the contaminant is inorganic.
 9. The process ofclaim 1, wherein the first reactant is potassium permanganate.
 10. Theprocess of claim 1, wherein the second reactant is sodium persulfate.11. The process of claim 10, wherein the first reactant is potassiumpermanganate.
 12. The process of claim 11, where at least one of thefirst and second reactants is incompletely coated by the matrix to forman incompletely coated reactant.
 13. The process of claim 11, where atleast one each of the first and second reactants are incompletely coatedby the matrix to form an incompletely coated first reactant and anincompletely coated second reactant.
 14. The process of claim 1, whereat least one of the first and second reactants is incompletely coated bythe matrix to form an incompletely coated reactant.